Supreme Court to Consider State Power in Immigrant Enforcement
The Supreme Court is set to hear a landmark case on how much states can act unilaterally in enforcing immigration laws. That case, filed by
In recent news, in an article titled, Trump Administration Begins Sending Asylum Seeker to Guatemala, this past Tuesday under a new rule the U.S. has decided to send back asylum seekers from Honduras and El Salvador back to Guatemala. Unbelievably the U.S government has come to an agreement to send asylum seekers without their consent back to Guatemala when arriving to the U.S borders without a visa or permission of entry. This now means, refuges will be denied any sort of entry or protection unless they are able provide enough evidence and proof to an asylum officer that they are at risk of being tortured and victimized if they are sent to Guatemala.
This idea of “Safe Third Country” has been an objective that the Trump administration has tried to pass and are still attempting to convince other countries that rest along the borders to also sign to allow refugees to seek asylum in their country rather than the U.S. In addition, the U.S had claimed that the Department of Homeland Security had verified that Guatemala was fit to properly evaluate and provide fair measures to determine whether the refugee was eligible for asylum. Yet, eyebrows were raised when it was found that the asylum office in Guatemala had fewer than ten employees. Days before this agreement was set to carry out, Department of Homeland Security made claims that they were unsure whether Guatemala would be able to provide the proper needs for refugees such as food, shelter and other necessities.
Trump administration needs to properly reconsider the new rule before allowing it to go into full effect. Refugees come the U.S with the intention of seeking help and protection and should not be thrown into a country where they too face life threating events.
The Supreme Court is set to hear a landmark case on how much states can act unilaterally in enforcing immigration laws. That case, filed by
Recent reports indicated that unauthorized crossings along the Canada-U.S. border were continuing to rise as people use alternative routes into the United States. Contributing factors
The Biden administration has implemented a new asylum rule that it says will help curb the number of migrants crossing the southern border. The new
In the wake of the 2024 elections, immigration policy has taken center stage, with proposals putting forward scalding debates. The major initiatives will involve the
A sudden spike in illegal land-border crossings into the northern U.S.-Canada border is making federal and state officials reassess resource distribution. For years, the northern
In the wake of the 2024 elections, several Republican led states are advancing new immigration legislation that would fortify border security and give greater powers
The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program hangs in the balance once more amid fresh legal efforts to strip its protections from undocumented immigrants who
In the aftermath of the elections of 2024, an increasingly larger economic cost has become one of the strong talking points for more restrictive immigration
There has been an increase in the unauthorized crossing of the Canada-U.S. border, as more and more people are trying to make entry into the
The U.S. Supreme Court will soon be hearing a case that may redefine state and federal roles regarding immigration enforcement with possible repercussions for states
A federal court decision has, once again, ignited debate over immigration detention facilities about the rights of detainees and the conditions of facilities. Detainees said
California announced a dramatic expansion in providing legal aid services to immigrant youth facing deportation, a lifeline to many young immigrants navigating the labyrinthine immigration