The Biden administration's new policies on migrant children represent a radical departure from earlier practices and mandating a humane approach to immigration reform. These mechanisms are purposed to give better care and momentary guardianship to unaccompanied migrant children than was given during the Trump regime.

With a rich background, Alejandro Mayorkas fills the position of Secretary of Homeland Security under President Joe Biden. Born in Havana, Cuba, and immigrated to the United States in his infancy, Mayorkas has done wonders in climbing up through a succession of legal and federal positions to spearhead major immigration reforms.

It is in this dangerous region of Panama, known as the Darién Gap, that a new strategy by the Department of Homeland Security will now have to deal with the flow of immigrants. The initiative forms part of a wider effort and strategy to deal with migration more in a more controlled manner as well as humanely.

The Latino advocacy groups decided to rally against Donald Trump due to his comments on immigration that he had voiced during the first presidential debate. Trump's claim that undocumented migrants from foreign jails are being "dumped" into the U.S. and turning around to commit crimes has been particularly denounced by Latino advocacy groups as harmful rhetoric and unwarranted.

On top of its rather lengthy rulemaking process, the Biden administration has pledged a set of direct actions to help reduce the impacts of extreme heat on workers immediately. OSHA will surge enforcement in the investigation of complaints on days that the heat index breaks above 80 degrees Fahrenheit by deploying more inspectors and making sure employers are abiding by the safety standards.

The Biden administration is announcing a new federal rule to protect America's workers from the dangers of extreme heat. This first step in developing a national heat standard was announced by OSHA with its action to come in the form of an advance notice of proposed rulemaking.

By reversing Chevron, it has chipped away at this previously afforded deference of federal agencies in their interpretation of vague legislation. As many cases at the immigration level often predicate on agency interpretations of legislation, under this new precedent, immigration cases might be heard in a much more neutral fashion.

A recent judgment by the Supreme Court has dramatically altered the landscape of the H-1B visa. The Patel v. Garland judgment gave indications that courts are now going to scrutinize decisions taken by federal agencies, particularly those touching upon immigration, much more strictly.